computer gc040e85fe 1280

Fair Work Commission’s power to stop sexual harassment

Victoria Quayle ||

The Fair Work Commission’s (‘FWC’) anti-sexual harassment jurisdiction commenced on 11 November 2021. Section 789FF of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (‘FWA’) provides that the FWC may make orders to stop bullying or sexual harassment in a workplace if the FWC is satisfied that:

  • the worker has been bullied at work by an individual or a group of individuals, and there is a risk that the bullying will continue to occur (FWA s 789FF(b)(i)); and/ or
  • the worker has been sexually harassed at work by one or more individuals, and there is a risk that the sexual harassment will continue to occur (FWA s 789FF(b)(ii)).

In accordance with section 789FC(1) of the FWA, a worker who reasonably believes that he or she has been bullied or sexually harassed at work may apply to the FWC for an order. Under the FWA a ‘worker’ is defined as ‘an individual who performs work in any capacity, including as an employee, a contractor, a subcontractor, an outworker, an apprentice, a trainee, a student gaining work experience or a volunteer’ (FWA s 789FC).

The decision of THDL [2021] FWC 6692

In the FWC’s decision in THDL [2021] FWC 6692, Commissioner Yilmaz dismissed an application for a FWC order to stop bullying and sexual harassment by ruling that the application had no reasonable prospect of success (FWA s 587 (1)(c)).

On 16 November 2021, THDL applied to the FWC alleging that they had been sexually assaulted by two individuals employed by a neighbouring business in the same warehouse complex.

Findings

The FWC was not required to make a determination on whether or not THDL had been sexually assaulted, but instead dismissed the application on the basis that there was no risk of future sexual harassment, an element that is required by section 789FF of the FWA. This was due to THDL no longer operating a business in the same warehouse complex, and the parties ‘no longer [having] physical connectivity’.

This case demonstrates that the FWC may dismiss an application for an order to stop sexual harassment if there is no risk of future sexual harassment occurring.

If you have any questions relating to the above, please don’t hesitate to contact a member of Coleman Greig’s Employment Law team, who would be more than happy to assist you today.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the content at the time of publication, information, regulations, services, and best practices may change over time. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Privacy Reform in Australia: What Businesses Need to Know in 2026-2027 (Part 2)

The next tranche of proposed Privacy Act reforms has arrived, with potential implications for businesses undertaking digital marketing, AI initiatives, customer analytics and other data-driven activities. We examine the key proposed changes and the practical steps organisations should consider if the reforms proceed.

Male Judge Writing On Paper
Parramatta Family Court: What to Expect

Attending Parramatta Family Court? Here’s what to expect, from getting there to what happens on the day, plus where to get support. Read our full guide.

Couple Having An Argument In Front Of Judge
Exclusive Occupation of the Family Home After Separation

After separation, disputes about who stays in the family home can quickly become stressful and complex. This article explains when the Family Court may make an exclusive occupation order and the factors considered when deciding who can remain in the property.

Juris what? What is accrued and cross-vested jurisdiction?

In family law matters, disputes sometimes involve issues that fall under both family law and other areas of law. The court may use either accrued jurisdiction or cross-vested jurisdiction to avoid separate court proceedings.

Forfeited…or not? When leases can be brought back to life

This article outlines the key principles and practical considerations relevant to relief against forfeiture. Forfeiture is when a tenant breaches a lease, a landlord may be entitled to terminate the lease and recover possession of the property.